Skip to content

Adding on-call team as owner for dependency-related files - #8884

Merged
kachawla merged 7 commits into
radius-project:mainfrom
kachawla:dependabot-approval
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

kachawla merged 7 commits into
radius-project:mainfrom
kachawla:dependabot-approval

Conversation

@kachawla

@kachawla kachawla commented Mar 17, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Adding on-call team as owner for dependency-related files to allow them to approve and merge version updates (Dependabot PRs).

Contributor checklist

Please verify that the PR meets the following requirements, where applicable:

  • An overview of proposed schema changes is included in a linked GitHub issue.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A design document PR is created in the design-notes repository, if new APIs are being introduced.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • The design document has been reviewed and approved by Radius maintainers/approvers.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A PR for the samples repository is created, if existing samples are affected by the changes in this PR.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A PR for the documentation repository is created, if the changes in this PR affect the documentation or any user facing updates are made.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable
  • A PR for the recipes repository is created, if existing recipes are affected by the changes in this PR.
    • Yes
    • Not applicable

@kachawla
kachawla requested review from a team as code owners March 17, 2025 19:12
Signed-off-by: Karishma Chawla <kachawla@microsoft.com>
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 17, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 59.89%. Comparing base (a513ad5) to head (afd7b7a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8884      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.89%   59.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         595      595              
  Lines       40481    40481              
==========================================
- Hits        24248    24245       -3     
- Misses      14406    14408       +2     
- Partials     1827     1828       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Resolved
@kachawla
kachawla temporarily deployed to functional-tests March 17, 2025 21:48 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@radius-functional-tests

radius-functional-tests Bot commented Mar 17, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository kachawla/radius
Commit ref f1765ec
Unique ID func5beec9d747
Image tag pr-func5beec9d747
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr:
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func5beec9d747
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func5beec9d747
  • dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func5beec9d747
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func5beec9d747
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func5beec9d747
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded

Signed-off-by: Karishma Chawla <kachawla@microsoft.com>
@radius-functional-tests

radius-functional-tests Bot commented Mar 18, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository kachawla/radius
Commit ref 909457b
Unique ID func6961decba6
Image tag pr-func6961decba6
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr:
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func6961decba6
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func6961decba6
  • dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func6961decba6
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func6961decba6
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func6961decba6
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

@brooke-hamilton brooke-hamilton left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While in the on-call role I'm unable to approve this Snyk PR which edits a Dockerfile, so maybe we need to add Dockerfiles as well. What do you think?

@radius-functional-tests

radius-functional-tests Bot commented Mar 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository kachawla/radius
Commit ref 1b8bc48
Unique ID func0aa3603fa8
Image tag pr-func0aa3603fa8
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr:
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func0aa3603fa8
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func0aa3603fa8
  • dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func0aa3603fa8
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func0aa3603fa8
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func0aa3603fa8
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

@radius-functional-tests

radius-functional-tests Bot commented Mar 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository kachawla/radius
Commit ref afd7b7a
Unique ID func30c81788ec
Image tag pr-func30c81788ec
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr:
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func30c81788ec
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func30c81788ec
  • dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func30c81788ec
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func30c81788ec
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func30c81788ec
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

@kachawla
kachawla merged commit 4912a06 into radius-project:main Mar 19, 2025
@kachawla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

While in the on-call role I'm unable to approve this Snyk PR which edits a Dockerfile, so maybe we need to add Dockerfiles as well. What do you think?

@brooke-hamilton addressed in #8933

@kachawla
kachawla deleted the dependabot-approval branch March 24, 2025 23:09
kachawla added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
# Description

I recently added on-call group as owner for a few dependency related
files to allow on-call to handle depedenabot/snyk PRs:
#8884. However, looking at
the list again, I realized that github workflows have a lot of core
functionality and are generally not limited to version updates, so
removing on-call team from the codeowners list for github workflows.

Signed-off-by: Karishma Chawla <kachawla@microsoft.com>

This branch was previously deployed

2 inactive deployments
functional-tests — afd7b7a1 Deployed Mar 19, 2025 by kachawla
publish-bicep — afd7b7a1 Deployed Mar 19, 2025 by kachawla
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants